WHAT ARE THE REASONS THAT THE EXTRA RELEASED ENERGY ACTUALLY CANNOT BE OBSERVED IN OTHER ELECTRIC MOTORS WORKING WITH PERMANENT MAGNETS TODAY, EVEN THEY PROVIDE LESS AMOUNT?

 WHAT ARE THE REASONS THAT THE EXTRA RELEASED ENERGY ACTUALLY CANNOT BE OBSERVED IN OTHER ELECTRIC MOTORS WORKING WITH PERMANENT MAGNETS TODAY, EVEN  THEY PROVIDE LESS AMOUNT?

   DISCUSSION

As it is known from thermodynamics and other laws of physics, there cannot be a machine more efficient than one hundred percent, and it is not possible to gain energy from nothing, so after the results of the experiment, it has been determined that the only source of the extra energy is the permanent magnets which interact with the electromagnets in the motor.

Here are the reasons why the extra released energy, which we can observe here, is actually less amount but cannot be observed in other electric motors working with permanent magnets today:

1-Because of the lack of a design that will provide a good enough interaction between the electromagnet formed by the electrical energy we give to the motor and permanent magnet:  In the motor of our experiment, a design was used that allows the interaction between the electromagnet and the permanent magnet to be in and in the center of the electromagnet coil winding, where the magnetic waves are the strongest, the part duty of core is continued by the permanent magnet and magnetic flux interaction can be realized on both the axial and radial axis by going beyond the routine motor classes.

2- Because the used permanent magnet is not large enough and the energy density is not sufficient: Since no ferromagnetic metal core is used in the electric motor stator in our experiment, there is no limit to the use of magnets of the desired power and size, very strong neodymium magnets in the grade of N52, which has one of the highest energy density that can be made today, can be selected in the form of a single double pole, in such large sizes that they are not used much even in other biggest permanent magnet motors, these efficiency values were achieved by increasing the magnetic energy/electrical energy ratio considerably. For example, 50 years ago, since such strong magnets with rare elements in their composition had not been discovered yet, so it was not possible to make a motor with this efficiency.

3- Since some motor energy losses, such as magnetic vibration losses, can not be calculated exactly, but approximately, since the determination of iron losses requires very complex calculations and extra measurements, for example, due to the fact that the characteristics of the core used in the electric motor cannot be determined in all aspects, wrong calculation results can be reached, due to the increase in the resistance of the coil wire used in the motor with the increase in temperature and the skin effect impress on the coil wire with the alternating current, the calculations of the additional heat losses due to the complex calculations are often avoided, even if the total energy released with all these losses is actually more than the given electrical energy, it is preferred to comlete the measurement results related to the energy rates given/released to hundred percent in almost all measurement laboratories or, since most of the time, only net mechanical efficiency determination-weighted measurements are made so some results may be overlooked.

4-Not taking into calculation the losses on the permanent magnet: In electric motor efficiency loss calculations, fuco and hysteresis losses are often not included in the calculations, regardless of the fact that permanent magnets are both conductive and contain iron, which is a ferromagnetic material and before determining the amount of losses here exactly and it is preferred to complete the measurement results related to the energy ratios given/released in the measurement laboratories to one hundred percent.

In my experiments, it has been observed that the hysteresis losses on the permanent magnet continue, albeit slightly, even if the permanent magnet and electromagnet poles are in the same direction. Due to the fact that the polar interactions are not only along the pole direction, the magnetic waves also have circular movements and the magnetic waves tend to concentrate at the corners, they can act even in the perpendicular direction to the poles, it has been determined that the electromagnet causes hysteresis losses on the permanent magnet in every position and these losses increase with the increase in the angle between the pole directions to approach 90 degrees, as during movement in electric motors.

5- Not taking into calculation the electromagnetic energy originating from the electromagnet, interacting with the outside of the system and not helping the rotation of the motor: In electric motor efficiency loss calculations, assuming that all of the electrical energy supplied to the electromagnet and electromagnetic waves released from the electromagnet remain within the system consisting of the electric motor, these losses are often not included in the calculations, even when it is included, the average values are used as in some motor efficiency calculation programs, regardless of the environment interaction and the environment in which the motor is located. However, it is not possible for electromagnetic waves originating from electromagnets to remain within the system at one hundred percent, due to the fact that the interaction of these waves is more at close distances on the way back to the other pole of the electromagnet depending on the environment in which the motor electromagnet is located, interaction with ferromagnetic materials or other magnetic wave sources that cause very little losses takes place.